欢迎来到OAJRC平台!

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Brain Research. 2022; 2: (1) ; 5-7 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijbs.20220002.

Observation on the effect of protective restraint clinical pathway nursing care for restless patientswith craniocerebral injury in neurosurgery
神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者采用保护性约束临床路径护理后的效果观察

作者: 倪晓霞*, 李欢, 黄姗

苏州市立医院北区 江苏苏州

*通讯作者: 倪晓霞,单位:苏州市立医院北区 江苏苏州;

发布时间: 2022-09-06 总浏览量: 29

摘要

目的 观察神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者采用保护性约束临床路径护理后的效果。方法 对我院在2021.2月-2022.2月收治的60例神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者进行观察,采用随机分组的方式,将上述患者分成两组,一组为实验组,接受保护性约束加人性化护理,另一种为对照组,接受常规保护性约束,对两组分别护理干预后的不良事件发生率、约束事件、约束次数进行对比。结果 在分别护理干预后,实验组的不良事件发生率,显著低于对照组中的患者,P<0.05,而在约束时间比较上,实验组患者的约束时间短于对照组,约束次数明显低于对照组中的患者,P<0.05。结论 对于神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者而言,采用保护性约束人性化护理,相较常规护理来讲,会降低护理中不良事件的发生率。

关键词: 神经外科颅脑损伤;躁动患者;保护性约束;临床路径;效果观察

Abstract

Objective To observe the effect of protective restraint clinical pathway nursing on restless patients with craniocerebral injury in neurosurgery.
Methods 60 restless patients with neurosurgical craniocerebral injury treated in our hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were observed. The above patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group was the experimental group, receiving protective restraint and huma- nized nursing, and the other group was the control group, receiving routine protective restraint. The incidence of adverse events, restraint events and restraint times after nursing intervention were compared between the two groups.
Results After the nursing intervention, the incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the patients in the control group, P<0.05. In terms of restraint time, the restraint time of the experimental group patients was shorter than that of the control group, and the restraint frequency was significantly lower than that of the control group. Patients in the control group, P<0.05.
Conclusion   Compared with routine nursing, protective restraint and humanized nursing can reduce the incidence of adverse events in the nursing of restless patients with craniocerebral injury in neurosurgery.

Key words: Neurosurgical craniocerebral injury; Restless patients; Protective constraints; Clinical pathway; Effect observation

参考文献 References

[1] 王小花,刘小珍. 保护性约束临床路径护理对神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者不良事件几率的影响[J]. 首都食品与医药,2021,28(13):118-119.

[2] 刘立平,张华英,夏佳佳. 神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者的保护性约束临床路径护理对于护理满意度的影响评价[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(25):157,170.

[3] 马媛,赵芳红,马世宝. 保护性约束临床路径护理在神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者中的应用[J]. 健康之友,2020(5):249.

[4] 胡茂婷. 论保护性约束临床路径护理在神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者中的应用[J]. 养生保健指南,2020(40):2.

[5] 陈智怡. 保护性约束临床路径护理在神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者中的应用[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2019,19(85):110,114.

引用本文

倪晓霞, 李欢, 黄姗 神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者采用保护性约束临床路径护理后的效果观察[J]. 国际脑科学研究, 2022; 2: (1) : 5-7.